Verstappen's Miami Sprint Was Perfect. Hadjar's Was a Masterclass in Failure.

Same car, same tyres, same 19 laps. One driver finished fifth. The other finished ninth and lost a second a lap doing it.

Isack Hadjar started ninth in Miami. He finished ninth. Max Verstappen started fifth, finished fifth. One of these performances was acceptable. The other was a disaster dressed up as damage limitation.

Key Finding

Hadjar was a full second per lap slower than Verstappen in identical machinery — and he didn't gain a single position.

The gap that never closed

HAD vs VER — gap between them on every lap

Watch the blue line sink steadily downward — Hadjar lost nearly 20 seconds to Verstappen in 19 laps, and the gap never stabilised.

HAD aheadVER ahead

Final gap: VER ahead by 21.7s.

Key Finding

Hadjar was a full second per lap slower than Verstappen in identical machinery — and he didn't gain a single position.

Let's be clear about what happened here. This wasn't a strategy blunder. Both drivers ran the medium tyre from lights to flag. This wasn't a quali mishap giving one a better grid slot — they started four places apart, sure, but Hadjar had Lewis Hamilton and Franco Colapinto between him and his teammate. Passing opportunities existed.

Hadjar didn't take them. He finished exactly where he started. Verstappen, meanwhile, held fifth against George Russell behind and Charles Leclerc ahead, managing the gap to both with the precision of someone who's done this before. One driver raced. The other circulated.

The speed just wasn't there

HAD (Lap 11) vs VER (Lap 19) — fastest laps compared

The green line shows Verstappen carrying more speed through every braking zone and accelerating harder out of the slow corners — this is driving, not setup.

HAD (Lap 11)VER (Lap 19)

Fastest laps: HAD Lap 11, VER Lap 19.

Key Finding

Hadjar was a full second per lap slower than Verstappen in identical machinery — and he didn't gain a single position.

The telemetry is brutal. Hadjar's fastest lap came on Lap 11. Verstappen's came on Lap 19 — the final lap of the race, after 18 laps of managing tyres in 49-degree track temperatures. That tells you everything. Verstappen had pace in hand. Hadjar was on the limit the entire time and still couldn't find it.

The narrative will be that Hadjar is learning, that he's still adapting to the car, that Miami is a difficult circuit with track limits traps everywhere. Fine. Verstappen got pinged for track limits at Turn 11 too. The difference is Verstappen was fast and made mistakes. Hadjar was slow and made mistakes — he lost two laps to track limits violations at Turn 11 on consecutive tours. When you're already struggling for pace, you can't afford to throw away clean air chasing laptime you don't have.

Key Finding

Hadjar was a full second per lap slower than Verstappen in identical machinery — and he didn't gain a single position.

Red Bull will point to the data and see a 0.994-second-per-lap gap and call it a development opportunity. That's the diplomatic read. The honest read is that Hadjar got comprehensively destroyed by his teammate in identical conditions, and he didn't have the racecraft to recover any of it.

Canada is next. It's a circuit that rewards bravery under braking and commitment through the Wall of Champions chicane. If Hadjar arrives in Montreal still circulating a second off Verstappen's pace, Red Bull won't be looking at the data anymore. They'll be looking at the driver market.

Nadia Ferreira

@@nadia_f_racing

Tap to continue